Can WPS become relevant?

The Equalizer interview with Nancy NeSmith is a very sad reading. Nancy and her husband are clearly well intentioned people pouring their effort and money into a business they were ill prepared to be involved in to begin with.
Unfortunately, NeSmith is not unique and we see it over and over again. Successful businessmen/women start a club and their business acumen goes completely out of the window.
From day one, the success of Gold Pride was built on a foundation of cotton candy and, I don’t say it with a light heart, was always going to collapse. The signing of Marta was the point where it became obvious that no-one in the Pride organization had any idea how to organize a club for long term success.
It was “let’s throw a load of money at an agent and his player”. Admittedly she is one of the best in the world, and helped them win the league title. “Lets hope it will work out. She is coming here to help us succeed long term, not because we’re paying her huge money. We’ll conveniently ignore the fact that nobody else in the world was trying hard to get her”. WPS owners have got to realize when you overreach yourself financially it will always end in tears.
You don’t have to have women’s football experience to see that everyone has money challenges in WPS – but their biggest problem is that nobody appears to know how to turn things around.

Warren Buffet, one of the most successful investors of all time, has been quoted saying “One should never invest in a business they don’t understand” and that “Risk comes from not knowing what you’re doing.” That appears to be a very real challenge.
Throughout the interview with Jeff Kassouf, Nancy’s naivety, lack of understanding and inexperience with women’s football comes through. It is laced with phrases such as “we gambled”, “we thought”, “we felt”.
This does not strike me as a sound strategy and it seldom works in business.
I understand that humans make errors. We all make errors of fact and errors of judgment. We have blind spots in our field of vision. These weaknesses put us at a disadvantage. We make decisions with partial information. Occasionally, we are forced to steer by guesswork. We go with our gut feeling. Long term, that rarely works. The “you hope for something and you wish for something” can never substitute a well thought out business strategy. The NeSmiths hired Montoya and Kessler, to give them intelligent guidance and advise when it comes to player acquisition and club building matters. When it came to signing Marta, every coach and GM wants to have the best player play for them. But its experience and prudence that must guide. It appears that it did not work out.
There are simple rules which all potential women’s football owners should pay attention to:
1. Never invest in a business you do not understand.
2. Never confuse charisma with expertise.
3. Never hire people who lack expertise in your business. (If they were never involved in women’s football before WPS came about, do not hire them.)
4. Never gamble your club’s future on one player.
5. There is no substitute for having a winning team.
6. A winning team does not guarantee commercial success, but a losing team guarantees commercial failure.
7. Success, like organic growth, is incremental in nature.
8. Marketing and hype is only useful when you have quality, otherwise its called false advertising and customers will leave in droves.

In the end, as much as I feel sadness for Nancy and her husband, I very much doubt whether they understand why their club failed.
Today, as I write, WPS clubs are losing relevancy internationally and locally; to potential sponsors, youth clubs and casual fans.
Unfortunately when you ask some WPS owners and GMs what business are WPS teams in,
the most likely answer will be entertainment or pro sports. Wrong on both accounts. Entertainment, really? Good luck competing against Hollywood films, video games, Broadway productions, satellite TV, etc. You can’t comete against the shear volume of options available in today’s world.
Pro sports? How do you compete against the NBA, NFL, MBA and even MLS. You can’t. You will have tough time competing against college handball and basketball.
So what business are you in? Pro football business in general and specifically pro women’s is pure fantasy. A drastically different model is required.
Any league or team can and will become successful only when it becomes relevant to fans and sponsors. Going into their third season, WPS owners still have not figured out how to achieve this. That is their biggest task.
To again quote Buffet: “Your premium brand had better be delivering something special, or it’s not going to get the business.”
And that in a nutshell is the sponsorship and attendance challenges WPS is facing, they can’t deliver, because they don’t know how, to deliver something special for their potential customers.
Reading the NeSmith interview it becomes crystal clear that NeSmiths never knew who their fans were, what they wanted, and how to attract them. Even more important, they did not know how to partner with sponsors and make themselves indispensable to their success.

Will pro women’s football in the USA survive and prosper? Of course it will. Remember that until Chuck Yeager broke the sound barrier, before Roger Bannister ran the 4 min/mile, people thought it was impossible. Still, if WPS teams simply continue to cut budgets, they will become another w-league. At that point they will cease to be relevant all together.

wSoccerNews.com interview with me

wSoccerNews.com meet with Shek Borkowski the other day to talk about women´s soccer. The status on the WPS, difference between Europe and US and the US women´s National team.

Q: USA are always known to have lots and lots of girls playing, especially at the youth levels. But it really hasn’t resulted in a lot of medals in the last few years. Why do you think that is? What do you think is missing?
SB: The problem is twofold. One, youth development needs an overhaul.
Technical and tactical development is not taking place. When I get players from universities, they are very athletic but many of them need remedial technical and tactical work.
Two, the most talented American youth players not playing in adult leagues. Some young players in Germany and Sweden, for example, are playing in professional leagues by the time they are 16. If you look at Umea, they’re really very young this year and their players are getting valuable experience. In USA even the best 16 and 17 year olds are still playing in youth competitions, against players their age.

Q: USA lost 2:1 to Mexico, what is the reaction in the US like?

SB: I would say of disbelief.

Q: Why in your opinion did USA lose?

SB: The days of beating Mexico or Costa Rica 11:0 are gone for good. The world is catching up and in many cases bypassing USA in women’s football. Familiarity breeds contempt, and so many Mexican and Costa Rican players play in USA and they are no longer intimidated by USA. I had a total of 7 Mexican players play for me at FC Indiana and they
are very confident in their ability. Also, internationally, technical, tactical, physical and psychological preparation has evolved so it will be more and more difficult for USA to maintain its elite status.

Q: Can USA get by Italy?
SB: Yes, but it will not be easy. Pietro Ghedin is shrewd and knows how to set up his teams. Italians are experienced and USA will need to play at a higher level than they did in the CONCACAF tournament.

Q: There has been some information that WPS is having some troubles.
SB: As any new league, WPS will face challenges. The question is whether WPS owners are investors or speculators, are they looking to develop long term or are they looking for quick profits. I hope that no WPS owner expected to make a fortune in 2 seasons. I think that many of the owners were like a teenager on a first date and now the reality has hit them, it will be hard work.

Q: What will happen to the game if WPS does not continue?

SB: I suppose that US Soccer will have to reestablish residency program but that would not be good. The other possibility will be that some top players will go overseas, some will continue to play in W-League and some will walk away from the game. I expect that if WPS folds there are 6-8 clubs in North America which will continue to offer good level on $200-400K budgets.

Q: You coached in USA and in Europe, what are some big differences.

SB: Better athleticism in USA, stronger players technically in Europe. Also, player approach to training is different.

Q: How did you decide to coach in Russia and what are you thoughts about it?
SB: My agent Anton Maksimov suggested it and the UEFA Champions League
was the main reason I wanted to go there. Russia is a new experience, people with different mentality and habits, but that is the beauty of coaching in different countries. It gives me another perspective on the business of women’s football.
Story from Wsoccernews.com. Read full story: http://wsoccernews.com/fullStory.php?id=1494#ixzz16IoSHFpy

soccer365.com interview with me

soccer365.com interview with me.

After last week’s earthshaking news that multiple WPS teams are considering folding and the U.S.’s loss against Mexico in the CONCACAF World Cup qualifiers, Soccer 365 caught up with respected women’s coach Shek Borkowski. Borkowski co-founded FC Indiana ten years ago in tiny Goshen, Indiana (population 30,000) and led the team to two WPSL titles, a W-League final, two U.S. Open Cup titles and exhibition victories over Australia, New Zealand, Trinidad and Tobago and WPS teams. FC Indiana sent nine former players to WPS in 2009 and was involved in the original development of the Chicago Red Stars franchise. Borkowski always ran FCI like a professional European club; in late 2009 he took over one–the two time reigning Russian champion and UEFA Champions League runners-ups Zvezda-2005.

Soccer 365: Will the U.S. qualify for the World Cup versus Italy and win the World Cup?
SB: I know Italy head coach Pietro Ghedin well so I am sure that Italy will be well organized, will defend deep and counterattack, and will be difficult to play against. Overall the U.S. has enough quality to qualify. As far as the World Cup finals, Germany are my favorites but anything can happen.

Soccer 365: WPS has made many personnel cuts at league and club levels. What are your thoughts about the league’s chances to survive?
SB: WPS faces important challenges at this time. While the economy plays its role, I would say that the biggest problem is the clubs’ business model and structure. I suspect that in five out of seven cases, clubs struggle because there is no proper structure and no long-term strategic plan in place. Blind spending can’t take precedence over strategy. The current WPS business model is flawed. It’s simply a scaled-down WUSA model. [WUSA lost over $100 million on 8 clubs over 3 seasons.] Right now, the clubs recognized that the model they bought into is not sustainable and they are making changes in order to avoid the unthinkable. Personally I hope the owners are in it for the long haul and understand they will have to keep investing in their teams.

Soccer 365: Can the league be profitable?
SB: Yes. Leading clubs in the USA must and can make a profit. Investing $2 to $3 million a year in a club with players on large salaries and competing in a sport where even winning league titles means financial losses is not the stuff shrewd investors are interested in unless they are vanity owners. So, profitability is the key but progress must be organic. Good examples for growing women’s football in North America are Ottawa Fury, Vancouver Whitecaps, Buffalo Flash and FC Indiana, where they are successful on 5% of WPS budgets.

Soccer 365: We have seen many coaching changes and player turnover in WPS during their two seasons. Why do you think that is?
SB: You have to understand that most WPS owners have very little or no experience in professional women’s football. Many of them lack experienced women’s football people advising them, which leads to poor decisions and the challenges get compounded. Make no mistake, men’s and women’s football are different, so someone who worked in sales for a men’s club will not necessarily make a good manager in leading a women’s club. As far as the players, one could wonder what analytical data/information is underpinning the selection or evaluation of players. Poor acquisitions lead to turnover, which makes it harder for clubs to market their players to fans.

Soccer 365: Is there a difference in working with American and European players?
SB: Yes, the training expectations are different. European players are used to more tactical work and specific opponent preparation. American players enjoy the physical aspect of preparation more. [While in Russia, Borkowski discovered that his Russian players treated soccer simply as a job. They came to train and then returned home to their other interests. North American players expect social bonding with their squads, spending a lot of time with their teammates off the field, because that’s what they experienced in college.]

Soccer 365: What tactical trends in women’s football are you noticing?
SB: For the most part top teams are very good in the first three phases of the game—possessing the ball, transitioning after losing the ball, and when the opponent possess the ball. What separates Germany from others is their dominant play in the fourth phase—transitions after winning the ball. The power, speed, purpose of their movement, and understanding when they win the ball sets them apart from the competition. Current German success, I believe, is based on their superiority in that fourth phase.

Jo-Ryan Salazar has left the house.

Its official, Jo-Ryan Salazar who for 2 years wrote about WPS is no longer interested in covering women’s football.
Can the league and the sport survive?

Jo-Ryan complains about the lack of atmosphere at WPS matches. I attended MLS matches in its early years and it was the same. It took time to build traditions, rivalries and the atmosphere.
I’m sure that Jo-Ryan will agree with me that today MLB is a commercial success. But in year 2 the league averaged 3,488 fans per game. Lower than WPS. It took MLB 44 years to pass the 10,000 mark.

Is Jo-Ryan a victim of need for instant gratification? I don’t know but all of us truly involved in building the sport are in in for the long run.
There will always be opportunists around looking for a quick fix, but women’s football is not it. It requires patience.
I am more encouraged with WPS owners today then ever before. Despite challenges, they continue and success after all is nothing more than hard work, commitment, and perseverance when others quit.

In any venture, as with dinner preparation, there always will be people with zero or minimal interest in preparation and post meal cleaning. They only show up when they smell the feast. As soon as its over, they are gone.
Jo-Ryan’s partner better beware, an extra 20-25 pounds in extra weight gain or wrinkles and Jo-Ryan could be gone…again.

Interview

Here is a copy of interview I did for LTA Agency.

Q: You have been a long time critic of US Soccer why is it?
SB: Because the federation is guilty of mismanagement when it comes to women’s football.

Q: In what way?
SB: Their mission statement is to “develop soccer at all recreational and competitive levels.” Ask any WPS, W-League or WPSL club in the country if they have received any assistance in physical infrastructure development or player development. MLS lost money for years and US Soccer directly or through its influence subsidized it for years.
Do you think they will support and rescue the WPS?
The federation has been a beneficiary of the NCAA generosity in facilities development and player development. Imagine where the sport would be today if it wasn’t for the NCAA? Outside of WNT player pool, US Soccer has done nothing for female players and infrastructure development for female players.

Q: But I understand that US Soccer is financially supporting WPS.
SB: No, they are subsidizing part of WNT players salaries.

Q: Why do you think US Soccer is not doing enough to support women’s soccer?
You must realize that US Soccer is an administrative and representative arm of Soccer United Marketing. As such it focuses on the men’s game and simply does enough to keep the women’s side quiet. Today, US Soccer, outside of WNT, spends less per registered female player than Chile.
Ask successful women’s clubs like Ajax America or New Jersey Wildcats how it benefits them to be affiliated with US Soccer. Right now, ask FC Gold Pride how it helped them being affiliated with US Soccer. Do you think what happened to FC Gold Pride would be permitted to happen to LA Galaxy? And LA has lost a lot more money than FC Gold Pride ever would.
If you are an investor in the men’s game you will be subsidized when needed. Not so on the women’s side.

Q: What can be done to change this?
SB: Nothing will be changed because change would require difficult decisions, choices and action by those involved with and fans of the women’s game. Those involved in women’s football in general are content with being neglected and being taken advantage of. It will continue.

Q: Can you be more specific?
US Soccer, SUM and their partners are interested in the bottom line, so all of us involved in women’s football would need to impact it negatively by boycotting Nike, Adidas, Gatorade and other US Soccer partners. Don’t support the MLS. Demand that US Soccer spends at least 33% of their budget on women’s football development; supporting women’s leagues, clubs, creating infrastructure and long term player development. Without financial pressures there will be no change.
But I just can’t imagine that women’s teams; youth, high school, college, W-League or WPSL would stop buying Nike or Adidas products. Can you imagine, for the good of women’s football, any US WNT players refusing Nike or Adidas endorsements? Not a chance.
All involved in the women’s game are content to get the crumbs and that is why the situation is getting worse.

Q: But for Nike and other US Soccer partners it has to make business sense to invest in women’s soccer.
SB: I agree, and that is why we need to demonstrate to them why it is a smart BUSINESS decision to support women’s football and a poor BUSINESS decision to ignore it. Companies like Nike spend more money on one basketball athlete than on entire women’s football in the country.

Q: You must admit that basketball is entirely different from women’s soccer.
SB: Of course, but it wasn’t so in the 70s. It took a leap of faith for a number of companies to support and grow the NBA and look where it is now. The same is required for WPS but we will have to press and we must start with US Soccer.

The performance was good enough to beat weak Costa Rica but will it be good enough against Italy?

Despite beating Costa Rica 3-0, USA suffered from having too big a distance from their central midfielders, Lloyd and Boxx (later Lindsey), to their strikers. Wambach and Cheney too often had to work their opportunities in isolation and that made life easier for Costa Rica. When playing 4-4-2, as USA did, you need either progression down the flanks or someone breaking forward through the middle. The Lloyd-Boxx partnership lacked energy and speed to break and cause damage. With Lindsey, who likes to come inside, playing on the left and O’Reilly on the right USA did not have a natural winger, and Lloyd/Boxx in particular needed to offer more support to the front players. Both were very quiet. It was fairly comfortable for Costa Rica midfielders, who were not forced back and could cover the areas in front of their central defenders. Defensively USA were left far too open, allowed Costa Rica time and space in midfield and a fair scoreline would have been about 3-1. Regardless of missing some key players and winning 3-0, USA showed a surprising lack of cohesion and basic errors were compounded by poor individual decisions. Pia Sundhage has much to do in a short time to prepare for Italy.

Women’s football in the USA does not suffer from lack of money and interest, it suffers from lack of ideas.

Mexico 2-1 USA.
“The greatest upset ever” proclaims Soccer America, and it may be.
But, having worked with 7 Mexican NWT players in the last 5 years, I am keenly aware of Mexico’s progress and abilities.
Is the Mexico result a precursor of challenges to come?
Yes, internationally the women’s game improves by 50% every 3-4 years but not in the US. So things may become more difficult in the future.
Should we worry?
In a one off any team can beat any opponent and every opponent the US faces will be up for the game. It was going to happen at some point that Mexico would beat the US, so no real reason to panic, yet.
Short term, I believe, Pia Sundhage has a squad well capable of qualifying and doing well in Germany.
Long term there are many reasons to be worried.
The technical abilities of our youth players are sub par.
Tactically we are naïve.
Women’s football infrastructure, outside of universities, does not exist.
There is no national strategy or structure for player development.

In all human activities: wars, battles, businesses, politics, sports, human relations, there are events which change the course, which give one entity advantage over the others. Visionary individuals and organizations spot those early on and utilize them to their advantage.
Women’s football is no different.
Winning the women’s world cup is an event which sometimes benefits the winning nation, as it did Norway, a nation of only 5 million people, in 1993. Germany benefited from winning in 2003 and 2007. Both nations used their success as a springboard to strengthen their leagues, clubs, programs and structures.
Post 1999, the US did not.

Women’s football in the USA does not suffer from lack of money and interest, it suffers from lack of ideas.
Today, there still are two major global leaders in women’s football: USA and Germany, but only one of them reacted to the success of the FIFA Women’s World Cup 11 years ago, and with it the commercial possibilities demonstrated, by exploring every possible way of maximizing that potential.
The 1999 success actually damaged the US by making the USSF complacent. On the other side of the Atlantic it demonstrated to Germany (and also the UEFA and FIFA) what women’s football can become.

In 1999 the German FA developed a long term plan for growing the women’s game sportingly, commercially.
From the beginning the Germans understood that building long term success, interest in the game, and fan loyalty, begins with a national, comprehensive, long term strategy. In Germany there is a balance that benefits both the Frauen Bundesliga and the national team. What is the USSF’s vision for women’s football?

In the US, the commercial success of 1994 and 1999 has not translated into investment in the women’s game.
Where has the money gone?
As I have stated before, the USSF is failing in its fiduciary responsibility of developing women’s football in USA. The federation’s lack of long term strategic planning has been clear to all who care to see it for a decade now.
The success of 1999 has blinded everyone to an international process where all important nations are gaining ground on the USA.
The success of 1999 has, in a perverse way, damaged us.

Right now, not in 2012, disconventional thinking is required. Women’s football, in terms of marketing, commercial potential, and player development, essentially is a 21st century phenomena but the USSF uses 20th-century methods trying to solve these challenges.
Women’s football will continue, and it will continue to grow internationally, and unless the USSF reforms, our international standing will suffer for generations to come.

Next week, “How to stop the tide – a blueprint for longterm women’s football success.”

Blame the USSF

The following was written June 24, 2008. LINK HERE:

“FC Indiana coach Shek Borkowski has been outspoken about the U.S. Soccer Federation (USSF) in the past, and now he is calling for improved investment in women’s soccer at the grass root level.
Borkowski is very adamant that the U.S. is losing ground to other countries, especially to Germany, and the federation needs to tackle some of the serious problems surrounding the women’s game if the U.S. wants to remain in the position of a global leader in the sport.
“The money, I am told, is there and it should mean better facilities for women’s clubs and investment in the sport in general,” said Borkowski. “But it isn¹t so, financial resources are very simply misallocated. The USSF President Sunil Gulati must reexamine how we are allocating money.
It would be really unfortunate but the way things are going, the rest of the world is catching up to the U.S. in terms of player development and even bypassing us in terms of investment in the game, Borkowski said.
Borkowski believes that some sweeping changes are in order.
Unless concrete steps are taken to boost women’s soccer at all levels, the game will stagnate. The new pro league will have spots for maybe 80 non-national team players, it won’t be enough.
But the truth is that the investment in the game is revolving around just the national players. Following Germany’s example, it needs to be broader a lot of work needs to be done to lift the infrastructure and there are too many promising post college players who walk away from the game because they see no future in it.
Borkowski also offered his support to United Soccer Leagues (USL) Executive Vice President Tim Holt efforts to establish a federation operated US Open Women’s Cup. This, according to Borkowski, would be of benefit to all clubs, pro and amateur alike, and bring added attention to women’s soccer in the country.”

Don’t forget Martin Sjögren!

A note from a reader in Sweden points out that FIFA short list for Coach of the Year does not and should include Martin Sjögren, head coach of LdB FC Malmo.
Absolutely correct. Martin has done a fantastic job of squad building and leading the club to league title, its first in 16 years.

Â

Women’s football happens while FIFA is still asleep

So FIFA has named its short list for FIFA World Coach of the Year for Women’s Football 2010 and FIFA Women’s World Player 2010.
Bernd Schröder (Germany/FFC Turbine Potsdam),
In Cheul Choi (Korea Republic/Korea Republic U-20 national team),
Albertin Montoya (USA/FC Gold Pride),
Maren Meinert (Germany/Germany U-20 national team),
Bruno Bini (France/France national team),
Silvia Neid (Germany/Germany national team),
Hope Powell (England/England national team),
Norio Sasaki (Japan/Japan national team),
Pia Sundhage (Sweden/USA national team),
Béatrice von Siebenthal (Switzerland/Switzerland national team),

Unless FIFA is including women coaches because they feel obligation to, I have no idea why Tom Sermani, Ricardo Rozo, or Pietro Ghedin are not on this list. Whoever prepares the shortlist is not fully aware of what goes on in women’s football.
Surely in 2010 all three have achieved a lot more than Neid, Powell, Sundhage and von Siebenthal.
Another question, why aren’t USA college coaches included.

So who should win?
It should come down Bernd Schroder, Choi and Montoya.